“Big move for yahoo”:http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/07/16/googles-marissa-mayer-tapped-as-yahoos-chief/?hp. I’d make job 1 cozying up to Apple and help supplant all the Google services on Apple devices. If Yahoo could become the most relevant internet content brand on the iPad and iPhone, that would be a good step forward. The weather, stock apps would be fine places to start, along with the maps app but that horse may have left the barn.
Cisco Announces Definitive Agreement to Acquire Pure Networks: Financial News – Yahoo Finance. Congrats to Pure Networks team, to Pure alums, Pure investors, and Cisco for getting a great asset. Good luck guys!
Talking Business – Oh Jerry, It’s No Longer Your Baby – NYTimes.com — agree with all of this, very glad I am not a yahoo stockholder —
Besides, even if the deal does win federal approval, you’ve chosen to become a pawn of the most dominant company on the Internet. How exactly is that going to lead to a brighter future for Yahoo?
And here is some tough love for MSFT —
As a stock, MSFT is done – stick a fork in it. And not just past and present, which has seen the terrible performance mentioned and is the reason, for example, that the QQQQ underweights MSFT in favor of overweighting AAPL and others (despite its mandate to track the index). I mean moving forward. If you want dividends, there are far better plays. And if want equity appreciation instead, make a list of MSFT’s top competitors, throw a dart at it, and invest in whoever you hit.
Lots of interesting views in there. Getting past the GOOG obsession is probably the most important one.
OK Yahoo could have been a Microsoft division, all of Microsoft’s internet ambitions would have been handed over to them, they would have been able to run semi-autonomously.
Or they can be ripped apart by private equity guys like Icahn — massive layoffs, milking their current traffic levels for cash flow, spinning off parts.
This is preferable? Did Yahoo management not foresee this??