<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Little Ludwig Goes A Long Way &#187; Backblaze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theludwigs.com/tag/backblaze/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theludwigs.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:00:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>My Current Digital Photography Workflow</title>
		<link>http://theludwigs.com/2010/05/my-current-digital-photography-workflow/</link>
		<comments>http://theludwigs.com/2010/05/my-current-digital-photography-workflow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 04:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aperture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backblaze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smugmug]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theludwigs.com/?p=4060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rich summarized his current photography workflow, lots of good stuff here.&#8195;My flow is different, it is interesting how much divergence there is between our solutions. We have similar camera gear and take similar numbers of photos I suspect, but the way we process is radically different. I bet our workflow for other digital tasks is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich summarized his <a href="http://www.tongfamily.com/archives/2010/05/panoramas/">current photography workflow</a>, lots of good stuff here.&#8195;My flow is different, it is interesting how much divergence there is between our solutions. We have similar camera gear and take similar numbers of photos I suspect, but the way we process is radically different. I bet our workflow for other digital tasks is not nearly as divergent; the photo software and storage market is very diverse.</p>


<ul>
<li>I also shoot in <span class="caps">RAW </span>and <span class="caps">JPEG </span>but I don&#8217;t do much with the <span class="caps">RAW.</span> It has been hard to find consistent <span class="caps">RAW </span>support in tools and so I have tended to ignore the <span class="caps">RAW.</span> Tho that may change&#8230;</li>
<li>Aperture is the core of my process. I import all photos off my storage cards into Aperture, I manage everything as Aperture libraries. I organize libraries in a Year/Month/Event hierarchy which seems to work well.&#8195;Aperture exposes this structure in the file system and thru the common dialogs on the Mac so I tend to be able to get at photos easily from any app.</li>
<li>My first line of backup defense is BackBlaze. It trickle backups constantly in the background transparently and so if I fail to do more explicit backup operations, I have this protection. </li>
<li>I also dump photo albums to smugmug using the aperture plugin on an irregular basis. This gives me another level of backup and a way to share with family.</li>
<li>Finally I copy the aperture libraries to a usb drive every once in a while for additional protection.</li>
<li>Aperture is pretty fast at previewing photos and has fine basic editing tools for cropping, touchup, color and exposure correction, etc. Good enough that I never feel the need for Photoshop or other expensive tools. And there are a ton of plugins available if I really felt like more photo munging.</li>
<li>Aperture 3.0 also has <span class="caps">RAW </span>support which I have yet to play with but need to try.</li>
<li>I don&#8217;t do any <span class="caps">HDR </span>or panorama or other deep processing today. No time.</li>
</ul>



<p>That is pretty much it. My solution is a little more expensive than Rich&#8217;s, I pay for Aperture, Smugmug, and Backblaze. But I find it all to be pretty fast. It does demand a reasonable MacBook, I just updated to the new i7 Macbooks with 8M ram and the biggest hard disk I could get.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theludwigs.com/2010/05/my-current-digital-photography-workflow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: theludwigs.com @ 2012-05-24 09:04:31 by W3 Total Cache -->
